Common and Uncommon Fear

The securitized lives in fear of a combination of punishments and external threats. Fear of the ruling powers and their police is a factor but more important and effective is fear of dangerous others and unknown threats - a generalized social fear. In some ways those who are in prison have less to fear; rather, even though the threats they face from the carceral machine, the guards, and other inmates, are severe, they are more limited and knowable. Fear in the security regime is an empty signifier in which all kinds of terrible phantoms can appear.

--Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Declaration 

But let's not overlook the formal equivalence between fearful situations by favoring one totalization of concrete experiences over another. Whether you are in prison or outside of it, there is always an Outside to your experiences.

Here, however, Hardt and Negri interiorize the prisoner's Outside within the experiences of the securitized, sheltering the prisoner from an Outside not his own, debasing his fear to accentuate the fear of the securitized.

But does the securitized know true fear? Does he fix his gaze on the Outside with frozen fascination? Hardly. The threat of "terrible phantoms" appearing is an amenity interior to his experiences, an excuse for resuming normal activities which now include the seamless integration of surveillance. The threat of annihilation is a buried nightmare.

Hardt and Negri would turn that nightmare into reality. They would awaken the securitized to true fear, the fear of God, the fear which only a prisoner can know - not to appreciate what he has, but to prove that what he has can be destroyed.